Friday, December 7, 2012

1212.1173 (B. A. Zauderer et al.)

Radio Monitoring of the Tidal Disruption Event Swift J164449.3+573451. II. The Relativistic Jet Shuts Off and a Transition to Forward Shock X-ray/Radio Emission    [PDF]

B. A. Zauderer, E. Berger, R. Margutti, G. G. Pooley, R. Sari, A. M. Soderberg, A. Brunthaler, M. F. Bietenholz
We present continued multi-frequency radio observations of the relativistic tidal disruption event Sw1644+57 extending to dt~600 d. The data were obtained with the JVLA and AMI Large Array. We combine these data with public Swift/XRT and Chandra X-ray observations over the same time-frame to show that the jet has undergone a dramatic transition starting at ~500 d, with a sharp decline in the X-ray flux by about a factor of 170 on a timescale of dt/t<0.2. The rapid decline rules out a forward shock origin (direct or reprocessing) for the X-ray emission at <500 d, and instead points to internal dissipation in the inner jet. On the other hand, our radio data uniquely demonstrate that the low X-ray flux measured by Chandra at ~610 d is consistent with emission from the forward shock. Furthermore, the Chandra data are inconsistent with thermal emission from the accretion disk itself since the expected temperature of 30-60 eV and inner radius of 2-10 R_s cannot accommodate the observed flux level or the detected emission at >1 keV. We associate the rapid decline with a turn off of the relativistic jet when the mass accretion rate dropped below Mdot_Edd~0.006 Msun/yr (for a 3x10^6 Msun black hole and order unity efficiency) indicating that the peak accretion rate was about 330 Mdot_Edd, and the total accreted mass by 500 d is about 0.15 Msun. From the radio data we further find significant flattening in the integrated energy of the forward shock at >250 d with E_j,iso~2x10^54 erg (E_j~10^52$ erg for a jet opening angle, theta_j=0.1) following a rise by about a factor of 15 at 30-250 d. Projecting forward, we predict that the emission in the radio and X-ray bands will evolve in tandem with similar decline rates.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.1173

No comments:

Post a Comment