Thursday, May 3, 2012

1205.0033 (Jianjun Jia et al.)

An Archival Chandra and XMM-Newton Survey of Type 2 Quasars    [PDF]

Jianjun Jia, Andrew Ptak, Timothy Heckman, Nadia Zakamska
(Abridged) We analyzed the {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton} archival observations for 72 type 2 quasars at $z<1$. These objects were was selected based on the [O III]$\lambda$5007 optical emission line which we assume to be an approximate indicator of the intrinsic AGN luminosity. We find that the means of the column density and photon index of our sample are $\log N_{\rm H}=23.0$ cm$^{-2}$ and $\Gamma=1.87$ respectively, which are consistent with results from deep X-ray surveys. The observed ratios of hard X-ray and [O III] line luminosities imply that the majority of our sample suffer significant amounts of obscuration in the hard X-ray band. A more physically realistic model which accounts for both Compton scattering and a potential partial covering of the central X-ray source was used to estimate the true absorbing column density. We find that the absorbing column density estimates based on simple power-law models significantly underestimate the actual absorption in approximately half of the sources. Eleven sources show a prominent Fe K$\alpha$ emission line, and we detect this line in the other sources through a joint fit (spectral stacking). The correlation between the Fe K$\alpha$ and [O III] fluxes and the inverse correlation of the equivalent width of Fe K$\alpha$ line with the ratio of hard X-ray and [O III] fluxes is consistent with previous results for lower luminosity Seyfert 2 galaxies. We conclude that obscuration is the cause of the weak hard X-ray emission rather than intrinsically low X-ray luminosities. We find that about half of the population of optically-selected type 2 quasars are likely to be Compton-thick. We also find no evidence that the amount of X-ray obscuration depends on the AGN luminosity (over a range of more than three orders-of-magnitude in luminosity).
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0033

No comments:

Post a Comment