Sunday, May 19, 2013

1305.2535 (Mihai Cara et al.)

Polarimetry and the High-Energy Emission Mechanisms in Quasar Jets. The Case of PKS 1136-135    [PDF]

Mihai Cara, Eric S. Perlman, Yasunobu Uchiyama, Chi C. Cheung, Paolo S. Coppi, Markos Georganopoulos, Diana M. Worrall, Mark Birkinshaw, William B. Sparks, Herman L. Marshall, Lukasz Stawarz, Mitchell C. Begelman, Christopher P. O'Dea, Stefi A. Baum
Since the discovery of kiloparsec-scale X-ray emission from quasar jets, the physical processes responsible for their high- energy emission have been poorly defined. A number of mechanisms are under active debate, including synchrotron radiation, inverse-Comptonized CMB (IC/CMB) emission, and other inverse-Compton processes. In a number of cases, the optical and X-ray emission of jet regions are linked by a single spectral component, and in those, high-resolution multi-band imaging and polarimetry can be combined to yield a powerful diagnostic of jet emission processes. Here we report on deep imaging polarimetry of the jet of PKS 1136$-$135 obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope. We find that several knots are highly polarized in the optical, with fractional polarization >30%. When combined with the broadband spectral shape observed, this is very difficult to explain via IC/CMB models, unless the scattering particles are at the lowest-energy tip of the electron energy distribution, with Lorentz factor $\gamma \sim 1$, and the jet is also very highly beamed ($\delta \geq 20$) and viewed within a few degrees of the line of sight. We discuss both IC/CMB and synchrotron interpretation of the X-ray emission in the light of this new evidence, presenting new models of the spectral energy distribution and also the matter content. The high polarizations do not completely rule out the possibility of IC/CMB optical-to-X-ray emission in knot A, but they strongly disfavor the model, because the permitted parameter space is very restricted, and because PKS 1136-135 is not a blazar, and thus its properties are inconsistent with what one would expect for such a highly beamed source. We discuss the implications of this finding, and also the prospects for future work.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2535

No comments:

Post a Comment