Nathan E. Sanders, A. M. Soderberg, S. Valenti, L. Chomiuk, E. Berger, S. Smartt, K. Hurley, S. D. Barthelmy, R. Chornock, R. J. Foley, E. M. Levesque, G. Narayan, R. P. Kirshner, M. T. Botticella, M. S. Briggs, V. Connaughton, Y. Terada, N. Gehrels, S. Golenetskii, E. Mazets, T. Cline, A. von Kienlin, W. Boynton, K. C. Chambers, T. Grav, J. N. Heasley, K. W. Hodapp, R. Jedicke, N. Kaiser, R. -P. Kudritzki, G. A. Luppino, R. H. Lupton, E. A. Magnier, D. G. Monet, J. S. Morgan, P. M. Onaka, P. A. Price, C. W. Stubbs, J. L. Tonry, R. J. Wainscoat, M. F. Waterson
[abridged] We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and
detailed follow-up of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova SN 2010ay at
z\approx0.067 imaged by the Pan-STARRS1 3{\pi} survey just \sim3 days after
explosion. We estimate the explosion date and the peak luminosity of the SN,
MR\approx-20.2 mag, significantly brighter than known GRB-SNe and one of the
most luminous SNe Ic ever discovered. We measure the photospheric expansion
velocity of the explosion, v_ph\approx19.2x10^3 km/s at \sim40 days after
explosion. In comparison with other broad-lined SNe, the characteristic
velocity of SN 2010ay is 2-5x higher and similar to the measurements for
GRB-SNe at comparable epochs. Moreover the velocity declines two times slower
than other SNe Ic-BL and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered
by radioactive decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually
large mass of 56 Ni, M_Ni=0.9+0.2 M_solar. Our modeling of the light-curve
points to a total ejecta mass, Mej\approx4.7M_solar, and total kinetic energy,
E_K,51\approx11. Thus the ratio of MNi to Mej is at least twice as large for SN
2010ay than in GRB-SNe and may indicate an additional energy reservoir. We also
measure the metallicity (log(O/H)+12=8.19) of the explosion site within the
host galaxy, placing this SN in the low-metallicity regime populated by
GRB-SNe, and \sim 0.2(0.5) dex lower than that typically measured for the host
environments of normal (broad-lined) Ic supernovae. Despite striking
similarities to the recent GRB-SN 100316D/2010bh, we show that gamma-ray
observations rule out an associated GRB with a flux, F_gamma>6x10^-7 erg/cm^2
(25-150 keV). Similarly, our deep radio follow-up observations with the EVLA
rule out relativistic ejecta with energy, E>10^48 erg. These observations
challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the production of a GRB,
and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2363
No comments:
Post a Comment